Saturday, July 6, 2013

Seeking Balance

Seeking Balance, (c) 2013 Margaret Bremner
Tangles: Beadlines, Black Pearlz, Florz, Ogen, Paizel, Tipple

To me, making art is seeking a fine balance between my go-with-the-flow, inspiration, do what feels right, process-is-important half and the half of me that knows something about composition and form and tonal values and wants the end product to look nice.

I recently answered a question in Ariane Goodwin's art business newsletter. Just as in real estate where the three most important things are location, location, and location, Ariane proposed that the biggest mistake artists make is not knowing the answers to these three questions: Why are you painting this image? Why are you painting this image? and Why are you painting this image? That was an interesting thing to think about. Here's my response:
--> -->
I (almost) never begin a work with the thought that "I want to portray this thing, or communicate that idea". Sometimes I don't know what it is I'm going to communicate until the piece is almost finished and I have a title for it. That said, I always have a very general idea of what I think I'm going to do - houses, trees, mandala, etc. - but anything beyond that develops as I'm working. In very general, I am also hoping to communicate things like a love of beauty, a sense of the sacred, concepts like wholeness, balance, joy, and transformation.



I suspect that this is how children work. They don’t decide to draw such-and-such. They just draw. When they’re finished (or nearly) it looks like something and then they tell us, “Look! It’s Superman with tulips!” or “This is you and daddy with an alligator and a box of treasure.” I think that we THINK they decide ahead of time what they’re going to draw, and we’re terribly impressed with their creativity, never thinking that it JUST HAPPENED because they were open to things just happening.



I think we choose our subject matter because something about it resonates with something inside us. If we can identify what that is (a color? a mood? a combination of shapes?) then we are better able to try to share that buoyant moment with our viewers.
Titles are important to me. I think they help people to connect with the art on a non-visual level. For those not immersed in the visual the way an artist is, this is not only helpful but possibly necessary to the appreciation of the art.


Of course, choosing subject matter doesn't apply to classic zentangle, but we still choose tangles. That child-like process of just seeing what happens is a key element of zentangle. There are no mistakes that can't become something more interesting. On the other hand, choosing subject matter often does apply to zentangle-inspired art.

What do you think? How do you work? Do you have favorite subjects, and if so, why do you like them? Do you rely a lot on inspiration or do you like to do a lot of planning?

12 comments:

  1. Realy a beauty! On my pentengel forum i tell about this one as a talking about.....
    For me i also go with the flow.
    And I realy love working with pen,black whithe en grey's.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Joke,
      I really think Zentangle has helped me learn to go with the flow!

      Delete
  2. If I tried the planning approach I'd never make anything. I have to start & just go along, try it & see. Zentnalge suits me & I'm becoming very fond of the black & white for I don't have to made decisions about colour. I love having the option of using the Icosahedron to pick tangles.......... It was so heartening to read your post.
    Paula (PEP)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I used to do a lot of planning. Well, with traditional mandalas there is a certain amount you have to do. But in university I was really up tight!

      Delete
  3. I am totally not a planner. I start with a vague idea of where I am heading with what subject matter but where I begin and where and when I end up are often not connected at all. Since my work is photo based and largely executed in Photoshop, I have the luxury of being able to duplicate any given stage where there are different options I could take, and follow both (or all) of them as I explore.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds a lot like the way I'm working these days, Judy. I really must set aside some time to learn PhotoShop! :P

      Delete
  4. I would say it's more going on faith until you see the thing that would make someone want to look at the picture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I tend to agree. Or until I think, 'this needs to come together better' then I consciously think about composition and other things.

      Delete
  5. Even with my lettering projects, it has come to be
    "JUST DO IT"
    No pencil lines to worry about, balance as you go and design with what appears in front of me, even if it is as my pen is flying.
    I love the freedom this gives me and pretty much 95-98% of the time I LIKE what I've done. I didn't have those percentages when I went about it in a more traditional pre-planned format. It always looked stiff or agonized over.

    So, yeah I like this approach, actually in most things I do. Like cooking or sewing or going for a walk. Never know what direction it will take me.

    maria

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Everyone who has commented so far goes with the flow! I thank Zentangle for helping me be a lot more comfortable doing that! :D

      Delete
  6. Love this entry Margaret! I'm a 'fly by the seat of my pants' kinda girl!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wonderful article. I forgot this while I was on vacation and got so frustrated with my art. It's good to be back where I can connect with inspiring folks like you :-)

    ReplyDelete